Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:34:40 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I suppose I'm surprised there are backtraces that are not important.
> Either badness happened and it needs printing, or the user asked for it
> and it needs printing.

Unfortunately that is the case. As my tests will fail if a backtrace is
detected.

> 
> Perhaps we should be removing backtraces if they're not important
> instead of allowing to print them as lower loglevels?

I usually end up removing backtraces for my tests, so I'm for this.
Specifically this happens in the drm and i915 drivers :-p

-- Steve


_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux