On 1/30/19 8:44 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: >> I'd prefer to change the define of STATUS_AD_MASK itself and keep all of this >> unchanged ! >> > Actually I'd prefer to leave STATUS_AD_MASK untouched. Otherwise we will implicitly assign > wrong value to STATUS_AD_MASK which is quite misleading. > > BTW, STATUS_AD_MASK is used in ASM code in v2 patch and it shouldn't be dependent on > CONFIG_ARC_USE_UNALIGNED_MEM_ACCESS. Agree ! -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
