On 12/19/18 8:16 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote: > In setup_arch_memory we reserve the memory area wherein the kernel > is located. Current implementation may reserve more memory than > it actually required in case of CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE is not > equal to CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE. This happens because we calculate > start of the reserved region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE > and end of the region relatively to the CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE. > > For example in case of HSDK board we wasted 256MiB of physical memory: > ------------------->8------------------------------ > Memory: 770416K/1048576K available (5496K kernel code, > 240K rwdata, 1064K rodata, 2200K init, 275K bss, > 278160K reserved, 0K cma-reserved) > ------------------->8------------------------------ > > Fix that. > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For backports, please also check how far back this needs to be applied (else we get bot emails specifying they don't apply to ver x, y z) > Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arc/mm/init.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/init.c b/arch/arc/mm/init.c > index f8fe5668b30f..a56e6a8ed259 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arc/mm/init.c > @@ -137,7 +137,8 @@ void __init setup_arch_memory(void) > */ > > memblock_add_node(low_mem_start, low_mem_sz, 0); > - memblock_reserve(low_mem_start, __pa(_end) - low_mem_start); > + memblock_reserve(CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE, > + __pa(_end) - CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE); > > #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD > if (initrd_start) So I looked into the history for restricting stable, and it seems this was introduced with our earlier work for HSDK. Before commit 9ed68785f7f this code was ok, since low_mem_start = CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE. With the patch we changed low_mem_start to CONFIG_LINUX_RAM_BASE and missed this. -Vineet _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
