On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:42 PM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 12:21 PM Andreas F?rber <afaerber at suse.de> wrote:
> > Am 13.09.18 um 17:51 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:02 AM Masahiro Yamada
> > > <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
> > >> Even x86 can enable OF and OF_UNITTEST.
> > >>
> > >> Another solution might be,
> > >> guard it by 'depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_OF'.
> > >>
> > >> This is actually what ACPI does.
> > >>
> > >> menuconfig ACPI
> > >> bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
> > >> depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI
> > >> ...
> > >
> > > ACPI is a real platform feature, as it depends on firmware.
> > >
> > > CONFIG_OF can be enabled, and DT overlays can be loaded, on any platform,
> > > even if it has ACPI ;-)
> >
> > How would loading a DT overlay work on an ACPI platform? I.e., what
> > would it overlay against and how to practically load such a file?
>
> The DT unittests do just that. I run them on x86 and UM builds. In
> this case, the loading source is built-in.
>
> > I wonder whether that could be helpful for USB devices and serdev...
>
> How to load the overlays is pretty orthogonal to the issues to be
> solved here. It would certainly be possible to move forward with
> prototyping this and just have the overlay built-in. It may not even
> need to be an overlay if we can support multiple root nodes.
You indeed need to refer to some anchors for most use cases, although a
simple MMIO device could just be anchored to the root node.
Topologies hanging off a USB device would be my first use case, too,
for serdev, or for e.g. the mcp2210 USB-SPI bridge.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
