[PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: Utilize phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 November 2018 at 21:41, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/18 12:39 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On 31 October 2018 at 20:28, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ARM64 is the only architecture that re-defines
>>> __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() in order for that function to populate
>>> initrd_start/initrd_end with physical addresses instead of virtual
>>> addresses. Instead of having an override we can leverage
>>> drivers/of/fdt.c populating phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size to
>>> populate those variables for us.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>>> index 3cf87341859f..00ef2166bb73 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>>> @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ static int __init early_initrd(char *p)
>>>         if (*endp == ',') {
>>>                 size = memparse(endp + 1, NULL);
>>>
>>> -               initrd_start = start;
>>> -               initrd_end = start + size;
>>> +               phys_initrd_start = start;
>>> +               phys_initrd_size = size;
>>>         }
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -408,14 +408,14 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>>>                 memblock_add(__pa_symbol(_text), (u64)(_end - _text));
>>>         }
>>>
>>> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && initrd_start) {
>>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) {
>>>                 /*
>>>                  * Add back the memory we just removed if it results in the
>>>                  * initrd to become inaccessible via the linear mapping.
>>>                  * Otherwise, this is a no-op
>>>                  */
>>> -               u64 base = initrd_start & PAGE_MASK;
>>> -               u64 size = PAGE_ALIGN(initrd_end) - base;
>>> +               u64 base = phys_initrd_start & PAGE_MASK;
>>> +               u64 size = PAGE_ALIGN(phys_initrd_size);
>>>
>>>                 /*
>>>                  * We can only add back the initrd memory if we don't end up
>>> @@ -460,12 +460,11 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>>>          */
>>>         memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_text), _end - _text);
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>>> -       if (initrd_start) {
>>> -               memblock_reserve(initrd_start, initrd_end - initrd_start);
>>> -
>>> +       if (phys_initrd_size) {
>>>                 /* the generic initrd code expects virtual addresses */
>>> -               initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(initrd_start);
>>> -               initrd_end = __phys_to_virt(initrd_end);
>>> +               initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start);
>>> +               initrd_end = initrd_start + phys_initrd_size;
>>> +               initrd_below_start_ok = 0;
>>
>> Where is this assignment coming from?
>
> __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() sets initrd_below_start_ok to 1 though
> after patch #5 this is not necessary any more.

Yes, but why? The original arm64 version of
__early_init_dt_declare_initrd() does not set it but now you set to 1
in the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) section in the generic code and set it
back to 0 here.

Or am I missing something?



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux