On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:49:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:45:30PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> writes: > > > > > We want to use the dma_direct_ namespace for a generic implementation, > > > so rename powerpc to the second best choice: dma_nommu_. > > > > I'm not a fan of "nommu". Some of the users of direct ops *are* using an > > IOMMU, they're just setting up a 1:1 mapping once at init time, rather > > than mapping dynamically. > > > > Though I don't have a good idea for a better name, maybe "1to1", > > "linear", "premapped" ? > > It seems like a nice counter part to the dma_iommu_ops used just about > anywhere else in ppc. > > But I'll happily take any maintainer bike shed decision for the next > series. Remember that in a merge window or two it will hopefully > go away in favor of the new generic dma_direct ops. Michael, please suggest what name you want for the next iteration, I don't want to hold up the series on a naming bikeshed.
