On Fri 2018-01-05 19:21:05, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (01/05/18 11:03), Petr Mladek wrote: > [..] > > Anyway, print_symbol() is an old weird API and it would be nice > > to eventually get rid of it. I could take this patches into > > printk.git. > > no objections from my side if the patch set will go through the printk tree. > shall we wait for ACKs or can we move on? do you plan to land it in 4.16? I am going to add this into for-4.16 branch. It is a rather cosmetic and trivial change. Therefore I do not think that we would need to wait for all the ACKs. Anyway, I am going to proactively check for potential conflicts with linux-next. > > Would you mind if I change the commit messages to something like?: > > > > print_symbol() is an old weird API. It has been > > obsoleted by printk() and %pS format specifier. > > I wouldn't. let's drop the "weird" part. other than that looks > good to me. OK. Best Regards, Petr
