On 02/26/2018 12:50 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi Vineet, > Vineet Gupta wrote, > >> On 02/26/2018 11:59 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: >>>>> The syscall cancellation failures are still there with gcc 7.3.0 and >>>>> binutils 2.30. Do you have any patches on top of it? >>>> Are you talking about these results? >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__downloads.uclibc-2Dng.org_reports_1.0.28_REPORT.arcv2.libc.uClibc-2Dng-2D1.0.28&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=7FgpX6o3vAhwMrMhLh-4ZJey5kjdNUwOL2CWsFwR4T8&m=TsxZS2Izf4LUrQfQCh9Iw8-L0zYXeJLdRhvUfyiWw2A&s=BGT84AxTG_-ymRw4CytOO7g6kTy7PXKYBrHbGF_pTR4&e= >>> No. >>>> But the link above points to stuff built with gcc 7.2 but not 7.3. >>>> Could you please share your results with gcc 7.2 and binutils 2.30? >>> Here with gcc 7.3.0 and binutils 2.30: >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__downloads.uclibc-2Dng.org_reports_git_&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=7FgpX6o3vAhwMrMhLh-4ZJey5kjdNUwOL2CWsFwR4T8&m=TsxZS2Izf4LUrQfQCh9Iw8-L0zYXeJLdRhvUfyiWw2A&s=Ni7_rqZq4c0mvnYsOyvZoZEIddMnIOEsSmopG9m9LwU&e= >> I ran into similar issues with glibc test suite. It seems gcc 7.x released >> won't cut it - it misses tons of upstream patches including >> >> 2017-11-03 e892f4fac605 [ARC] Fix to unwinding. >> >> So your best bet is to use upstream gcc master ! > gcc 7 branch or gcc 8 latest greatest? AFAIK gcc 8 is not released yet, so upstream/master ! > Last time there was some issue with gcc8 and you told me to use gcc7 > with some patches. Right there was yet another code gen issue / ICE at the time, which is likely gone now. But gcc upstream/master works for me. > /me is confused. Sorry if I steered you the wrong way. At that time upstream was practically not usable, so more unwinder tests failing were kind of secondary on priority ;-) -Vineet
