Hi Noam, On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:26 +0000, Noam Camus wrote: > > > > From: Alexey Brodkin [mailto:Alexey.Brodkin at synopsys.com]? > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 14:15 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/entry-compact.S? > > > b/arch/arc/kernel/entry-compact.S index f285dbb..d152d36 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arc/kernel/entry-compact.S > > > +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/entry-compact.S > > > @@ -203,6 +203,17 @@ END(handle_interrupt_level2) > > > ?; --------------------------------------------- > > > ?ENTRY(mem_service) > > > ? > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_EZNPS_MEM_ERROR) > > > +????????; SW workaround to cover up on a difference between > > > +????????; NPS real chip and simulator behaviors. > > > +????????; NPS real chip will activate a machine check exception > > > +????????; in case of memory error, while the simulator will > > > +????????; trigger a level 2 interrupt. Therefor this code section > > > +????????; should be reached only in simulation mode. > > > +????????; DEAD END: display Regs and HALT > > > > > I'm not really buying that. > > > > > Why don't you just make simulator behaving exactly as your real chip? > I can't change simulator core behavior. nSIM is a Synopsys proprietary code. Well probably it worth discussing with nSIM team if they may have any suggestions on how to align nSIM behavior with your real HW? -Alexey
