On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 21:31 +0100, gregkh at linuxfoundation.org wrote: > That's a big sign that your patch series needs work. Break it up into > smaller pieces, it should be possible, which will make merges easier > (well, different in a way.) Hello Greg, Can you have a look at the attached patches? These three patches are a splitup of the single patch at the start of this e-mail thread. Thanks, Bart. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-treewide-Move-dma_ops-from-struct-dev_archdata-into-.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 22418 bytes Desc: 0001-treewide-Move-dma_ops-from-struct-dev_archdata-into-.patch URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20170111/bdb07969/attachment-0003.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0002-treewide-Consolidate-set_dma_ops-implementations.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2885 bytes Desc: 0002-treewide-Consolidate-set_dma_ops-implementations.patch URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20170111/bdb07969/attachment-0004.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0003-treewide-Consolidate-get_dma_ops-implementations.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 19530 bytes Desc: 0003-treewide-Consolidate-get_dma_ops-implementations.patch URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20170111/bdb07969/attachment-0005.bin>
