On 09/20/2016 03:56 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 01:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> - is that what perf event grouping is ?
>>
>> Again, nope. Perf event groups are single counter (so no implicit
>> addition) that are co-scheduled on the PMU.
>
> I'm not sure I understand - does this require specific PMU/arch support - as in
> multiple conditions feeding to same counter.
My read is that is that what Peter meant was that each event in the perf event group is a single counter, so all the events in the group are counted simultaneously. (No multiplexing.)
>> You can do it like:
>>
>> perf stat -e '{cycles,instructions}'
>>
>> Which will place the cycles event and the instructions event in a group
>> and thereby guarantee they're co-scheduled.
>
> Again when you say co-scheduled what do you mean - why would anyone use the event
> grouping - is it when they only have 1 counter and they want to count 2
> conditions/events at the same time - isn't this same as event multiplexing ?
I'd say it's the converse of multiplexing. Instead of mapping multiple events to a single counter, perf event groups map a set of events each to their own counter, and they are active simultaneously. I suppose it's possible for the _groups_ to be multiplexed with other events or groups, but the group as a whole will be scheduled together, as a group.
If you have a single counter, I don't believe you can support perf event groups, by definition.
Regards,
Paul Clarke, IBM
