On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/03/2016 03:38 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:41PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> This adds support for > >> > >> - CONFIG_ARC_TIMERS : legacy 32-bit TIMER0 and TIMER1 which count UP > >> from @CNT to @LIMIT, before optionally triggering an interrupt. > >> These are programmed using ARC auxiliary register interface. > >> These are present in all ARC cores (ARC700 and ARC HS38) > >> TIMER0 serves as clockevent for all ARC linux builds. > >> TIMER1 is used for clocksource in arc700 builds. > >> > >> - CONFIG_ARC_TIMERS_64BIT: 64-bit counters, RTC and GFRC found in > >> ARC HS38 cores. These are independnet IP blocks with different > >> programming model respectively. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com> > >> --- > > > > [ ... ] > > > >> #include <linux/of_irq.h> > >> -#include <asm/irq.h> > >> > >> #include <soc/arc/timers.h> > >> #include <soc/arc/mcip.h> > >> @@ -263,7 +248,7 @@ static irqreturn_t timer_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > >> * irq_set_chip_and_handler() asked for handle_percpu_devid_irq() > >> */ > >> struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(&arc_clockevent_device); > >> - int irq_reenable = clockevent_state_periodic(evt); > >> + int irq_reenable __maybe_unused = clockevent_state_periodic(evt); > > > > Why is needed __maybe_unused ? I see in the previous driver 'irq_reenable' is > > used or is there a change in the previous patches I missed ? > > This is needed when not building for CONFIG_ARC (saw this when building for ARM) > write_aux_reg() becomes a no-op which causes a warning: > > write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_TIMER0_CTRL, irq_reenable | TIMER_CTRL_NH); Instead of adding the __maybe_unused, changing in patch 7/10: #define read_aux_reg(r) 0 #define write_aux_reg(r, v) by static inline int read_aux_reg(void *) { return 0; } static inline void write_aux_reg(void *, u32) { ; } Should fix the warning.