On Monday 02 May 2016 05:13:46 Vineet Gupta wrote: > On Saturday 30 April 2016 02:59 AM, James Hogan wrote: > > The newer renameat2 syscall provides all the functionality provided by > > the renameat syscall and adds flags, so future architectures won't need > > to include renameat. > > > > Therefore drop the renameat syscall from the generic syscall list unless > > __ARCH_WANT_RENAMEAT is defined by the architecture's unistd.h prior to > > including asm-generic/unistd.h, and adjust all architectures using the > > generic syscall list to define it so that no in-tree architectures are > > affected. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan at imgtec.com> > > Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com> # for arch/arc Applied to the asm-generic, tree, thanks! Arnd
