On Friday 18 March 2016 15:50:11 Vineet Gupta wrote: > Sure, but I prefer this to be only for gcc 4.8 as this warning seems to be > healthy in small doses At least it keeps the door open for future discussion > with gcc guys ! FWIW, testing on ARM with gcc-6.0 -O3, I also get tons of maybe-uninitialized warnings. It's unlikely that this is architecture specific or fixed in newer compiler versions. > The following nested construct actually works - does that look OK to you ? > > ARCH_CFLAGS += -O3 $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)) Yes, that seems ok. I don't really understand why -O3 is needed though, maybe it's better to assume that it won't be needed in future gcc versions and do ARCH_CFLAGS += $(call cc-ifversion, -lt, 0408, -O3 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)) Arnd
