Hi Alexey,
Alexey Brodkin wrote,
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> Just saw that new change for ARC ("arc: use generic lowlevellock",
> http://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=1b49dc96d103e0151fee290d55cea55aa12c906d).
>
> Even though this is very nice to see fixes and improvements done by people
> outside Synopsys IMHO it still makes sense to add SNPS people in the loop so
> we may review submitted patches.
You are right, I first thought I need to add you, then I thought you
are reading the low traffic list anyway.
Sorry for the trouble.
> So could you please first get an Ack from either Vineet (in Cc) or me before
> committing stuff for ARC? Alternatively just Cc?linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org.
I will do in the future. Do you thing following patch would be okay
to commit to make changes to architecture specific parts
more formal?
> Again I'm very happy with uClibc-ng and appreciate a lot all your efforts
> and to make uClibc-ng more robust let's review stuff together.
>
> Also it was hard for me to find a relevant patch on the mailing list
> because I was expecting patch to be sent via git "send-email" (which I think
> should be a standard way for patch submissions in uClibc). Only going through a relevant
> thread for ARM I found a message with attached files.
Is the commit okay or do I need to revert it?
@Max: Okay to add you as Xtensa maintainer?
best regards
Waldemar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-add-MAINTAINERS-information.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20160613/1786218c/attachment.bin>
