On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >> Indeed your 2/2 seems to be the most "past-proof" code change. So I >> >would think it >> >is indeed better and is something I should have done in the first >> >place. >> > >> >@Alexey, @Vlad what say you ? > uClibc traditionally supports the current stable release of binutils, which would make it patch #1 I think. > But 2/2 works for both and makes actual binutils version moot. FWIW, ARC tools don't as of last release didn't use the upstream/stable binutils, but we are pretty close to that now though. Thx, -Vineet
