Hi, On 2/4/2016 11:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> What do you think? > > I don't think the "dw" part is relevant (none of the other > DesignWare-based drivers includes it in the driver or file name). > > How do people typically refer to this board? > > I really like "synopsys" because it fits the pattern of being > recognizable and pronounceable like "altera", "designware", "qcom", > "keystone", "layerscape", "tegra", etc. But I can't tell whether it's > too generic. > > "ipk" or "haps" would be fine with me. I think it's OK if it doesn't > cover 100% of the possible systems. I think we should follow the iproc example: pcie-iproc-platform.c In this case we would have pcie-designware-platform.c I think this would be the best name because the driver is a non soc specific designware platform driver. Arnd and Bjorn agree on this name? > > Bjorn > Joao
