Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/sgx: Resolve EREMOVE page vs EAUG page data race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 9:34 PM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon Aug 12, 2024 at 11:25 AM EEST, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > > Ditto.
> >
> > Just to be sure: I assume this means "Fixes should be in the head of the
> > series so please reorder"? If yes, please see my reply in the other email
> > [1].
>
> OK, based on your earlier remarks and references I agree with you.
>
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240812082128.3084051-1-dmitrii.kuvaiskii@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > --
> > Dmitrii Kuvaiskii
>
> I think for future and since we have bunch of state flags, removing
> that "e.g." is worth of doing. Often you need to go through all of
> the flags to remind you how they interact, and at that point "one
> vs many" does help navigating the complexity.

Actually every time there's a patch that has anything to do with
the state flags I go through all  of em as a reminder. Might seem
like irrelevant detail but really is not (and neither unnecessarry
nitpicking). All small clues speed up that process or can mislead.

BR, Jarkko





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux