On Mon Apr 1, 2024 at 12:29 PM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote: > On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 13:17 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu Mar 28, 2024 at 2:53 PM EET, Huang, Kai wrote: > > > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/epc_cgroup.c > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > > +// Copyright(c) 2022 Intel Corporation. > > > > > > It's 2024 now. > > > > > > And looks you need to use C style comment for /* Copyright ... */, after looking > > > at some other C files. > > > > To be fair, this happens *all the time* to everyone :-) > > > > I've proposed this few times in SGX context and going to say it now. > > Given the nature of Git copyrights would anyway need to be sorted by > > the Git log not possibly incorrect copyright platters in the header > > and source files. > > > > Sure fine to me either way. Thanks for pointing out. > > I have some vague memory that we should update the year but I guess I was wrong. I think updating year makes sense! I'd be fine not having copyright platter at all since the commit is from Intel domain anyway but if it is kept then the year needs to be corrected. I mean Git commit stores all the data, including exact date. BR, Jarkko
