On Thu, 01 Feb 2024 17:28:32 -0600, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Tue Jan 30, 2024 at 4:09 AM EET, Haitao Huang wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Introduce a data structure to wrap the existing reclaimable list and its
spinlock. Each cgroup later will have one instance of this structure to
track EPC pages allocated for processes associated with the same cgroup.
Just like the global SGX reclaimer (ksgxd), an EPC cgroup reclaims pages
from the reclaimable list in this structure when its usage reaches near
its limit.
Use this structure to encapsulate the LRU list and its lock used by the
global reclaimer.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'd put author as last sob but that said I'm not sure if there is rigid
rule to do so. Thus not saying must here.
The documentation says "the ordering of Signed-off-by: tags should reflect
the chronological history of the patch insofar as possible, regardless of
whether the author is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:. Notably,
the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting
the patch."
So this should be OK.
[...]
struct sgx_epc_page *__sgx_alloc_epc_page(void);
void sgx_free_epc_page(struct sgx_epc_page *page);
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
BR, Jarkko
Thank you!
Haitao
