Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/sgx: Ensure correct secinfo struct alignment in test enclave.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 18:58 +0200, Jo Van Bulck wrote:
> Declare the secinfo struct as volatile to prevent compiler optimizations
> from passing an unaligned pointer to ENCLU.

We already have __aligned.  Can you provide more information in what
circumstances that __aligned isn't enough to guarantee the alignment?

We have a lot of kernel code which has __aligned but doesn't have volatile.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jo Van Bulck <jo.vanbulck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c
> index 4e31a6c3d673..aba301abefb8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sgx/test_encl.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ enum sgx_enclu_function {
>  
>  static void do_encl_emodpe(void *_op)
>  {
> -	struct sgx_secinfo secinfo __aligned(sizeof(struct sgx_secinfo)) = {0};
> +	/* declare secinfo volatile to preserve alignment */
> +	volatile struct sgx_secinfo secinfo __aligned(sizeof(struct sgx_secinfo)) = {0};
>  	struct encl_op_emodpe *op = _op;
>  
>  	secinfo.flags = op->flags;
> @@ -32,7 +33,8 @@ static void do_encl_emodpe(void *_op)
>  
>  static void do_encl_eaccept(void *_op)
>  {
> -	struct sgx_secinfo secinfo __aligned(sizeof(struct sgx_secinfo)) = {0};
> +	/* declare secinfo volatile to preserve alignment */
> +	volatile struct sgx_secinfo secinfo __aligned(sizeof(struct sgx_secinfo)) = {0};
>  	struct encl_op_eaccept *op = _op;
>  	int rax;
>  





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux