On 12/5/22 08:33, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > The helpers were added because Jarrko requested a queue abstraction for > the sgx_epc_lru_lists data structure in the first round of reviews. the > simple one line inlines are effectively just renaming to make the queue > abstraction more obvious to the reader. Jarkko, Do you have any issues with zapping these helpers? I really don't think they add to readability. The "reclaimable" versus "unreclaimable" naming is patently obvious from the structure member names. I'm not sure what value it adds to have them in the function names too.
