On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:29:13PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:00:54PM +0000, Dhanraj, Vijay wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 5:18 AM > > > To: Dhanraj, Vijay <vijay.dhanraj@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: linux-sgx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chatre, Reinette > > > <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Huang, Haitao > > > <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SGX selftest `augment_via_eaccept_long` > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:14:56PM -0700, vijay.dhanraj@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > From: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > This commit adds a new test case which is same as > > > > `augment_via_eaccept` but adds more number of EPC pages to stress test > > > `EAUG` via `EACCEPT`. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vijay Dhanraj <vijay.dhanraj@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Hey, to reproduce the original issue: does it reproduce on VM or should I run > > > baremetal kernel? > > > > > > BR, Jarkko > > > > Hi Jarkko, The issue should be reproducible on baremetal kernel. > > Thanks. I need comment out other tests in order to make sane out of this :-) Mentioning this because came into realization that stress tests should be IMHO moved each to a separate binary (so that they can be run separately). Just a note (TODO) to myself. I'll work on this today again and *possibly* split your test to its own application to get a starting point for forementioned. BR, Jarkko
