On 2022/5/16 10:29, Kai Huang wrote: > On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 13:39 +0800, Zhiquan Li wrote: >> On 2022/5/14 00:35, Luck, Tony wrote: >>>>> Do you think the processes sharing the same enclave need to be killed, >>>>> even they had not touched the EPC page with hardware error? >>>>> Any ideas are welcome. >>>> I do not think the patch set is going to wrong direction. This discussion >>>> was just missing from the cover letter. >> OK, I will add this point into v2 of cover letter and patch 03. >> >> > I don't think you should add to patch 03. The same enclave can be shared by > multiple processes is only true for host enclaves, but not virtual EPC isntance. > Virtual EPC instance is just a raw EPC resource which is accessible to guest, > but how enclaves are created on this EPC resource is completely upto guest. > Therefore, one virtual EPC cannot be shared by two guests. > Thanks for your clarification, Kai. Patch 04 is for the host case, we can put it there. May I add your comments in patch 03 and add you as "Acked-by" in v2? I suppose it is a good answer if someone has the same question. Best Regards, Zhiquan > > -- Thanks, -Kai
