On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:14:22AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > Let's imagine an extreme (thankfully imaginary) case: SGX has been > totally broken by some attack. All running enclaves might have been > compromised. A magical microcode update comes and saves the day and > mitigates the attack. > > From the hardware perspective, at the time of the microcode update, the > (presumably compromised) enclaves *can* still run. Here's where you lost me: the enclaves are presumably compromised and yet you wanna leave them running?! Isn't the strategy to kill them to limit the spread of whatever has compromised them? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette