On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 09:09:27PM +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:58:00AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On 2/20/22 10:52, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > >> Am I just all twisted around from looking at this code too much? Could > > >> you please take another look and send a new version of the patch? > > > Yeah, I will. It took me two weeks to make full remote attestation > > > implementation for SGX in Rust but at least I can confirm that all > > > the kernel bits work on that (and this will also help me to finish > > > the man page because it is pretty nasty to document it if you haven't > > > gone to the rabbit hole yourself). > > > > > > I'll prioritize now to get SGX2 patches tested with Enarx implementation > > > but this 2nd thing in my kernel queue. > > > > I really prioritize bug fixes over new features. New features can's > > really get merged until this gets fixed up. > > Fair enough. In this case I was not exactly sure whether it is categorized > as bug or enhancement. Should I also put a fixes tag to this to the > original reclaimer code (since it has been like this since the epoch)? I'll keep the fixes tag, and send a new version of the patch, as soon as I have tested it (working on it right now). BR, Jarkko
