Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/sgx: Add accounting for tracking overcommit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:43:35 -0600, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 1/11/22 06:20, Haitao Huang wrote:
If the system has a ton of RAM but limited EPC, I think it makes sense to allow more EPC swapping, can we do min(0.5*RAM, 2*EPC)? I suppose if the system is used for heavy enclave load, user would be willing to at least use half of RAM.

If I have 100GB of RAM and 100MB of EPC, can I really *meaningfully* run 50GB of enclaves? In that case, if everything was swapped out evenly, I would only have a 499/500 chance that a given page reference would fault.


The formula will cap swapping at 2*EPC so only 200MB swapped out. So the miss is at most 1/3. The original hard coded cap 1.5*EPC may still consume too much RAM if RAM<1.5*EPC.

This isn't about a "heavy enclave load". If there is *that* much swapped-out enclave memory, will an enclave even make meaningful forward progress?





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux