On 12/20/21 1:35 PM, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > Thanks for your more detailed explanation - I will take a look at the > VM overcommit limits. Since obviously the original implementation did > have a default value set, I had still a remaining specific question > about your comments. Are you suggesting that there should not be a way > to override any overcommit limit at all? So drop the parameter all > together? Yes, let's kill the exposed tunable. We don't have any strong, practical need for it at the moment other than paranoia.
