[PATCH 4/4] KVM: X86: Potential 'index out of range' bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The kvm_get_vcpu() will call for the array_index_nospec()
with the value of atomic_read(&(v->kvm)->online_vcpus) as size,
and the value of constant '0' as index.
If the size is also '0', it will be unreasonabe
that the index is no less than the size.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Jiasheng <jiasheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e0f4a46..c59013c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2871,7 +2871,7 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
 				       offsetof(struct compat_vcpu_info, time));
 	if (vcpu->xen.vcpu_time_info_set)
 		kvm_setup_pvclock_page(v, &vcpu->xen.vcpu_time_info_cache, 0);
-	if (v == kvm_get_vcpu(v->kvm, 0))
+	if (atomic_read(&(v->kvm)->online_vcpus) > 0 && v == kvm_get_vcpu(v->kvm, 0))
 		kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(v->kvm, &vcpu->hv_clock);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.7.4




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux