Re: [PATCH v5] sgx.7: New page with overview of Software Guard eXtensions (SGX)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/10/21 7:52 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +This can lead to reserving a large region than required by the payload,
> +but the address space can be obviously trimmed after the enclave has been
> +constructed on,
> +with a sequence of
> +.BR mmap(MAP_FIXED)
> +calls.

Sorry if I missed this previously.

But, do we really intend to suggest the use of mmap(MAP_FIXED) for this?
 What's the harm in leaving a non-populated piece of address space of
mmap()'d /dev/sgx_enclave?



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux