On 4/1/21 7:56 AM, Raoul Strackx wrote: > > SOLUTION OF THIS PATCH > This patch adds a new ioctl to enable userspace to execute EEXTEND leaf > functions per 256 bytes of enclave memory. This enables enclaves to be > build as specified by enclave providers. I think tying the user ABI to the SGX architecture this closely is a mistake. Do we need another ioctl() or can we just relax the existing add_pages ioctl() to allow unaligned addresses?
