On 2/4/21 8:28 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> Do we see any security risk here? > Not with current CPUs, which drop writes and read all ones. If future CPUs take > creatives liberties with the SDM, then we could have a problem, but that's why > Dave is trying to get stronger guarantees into the SDM. I really don't like the idea of the abort page being used by code that doesn't know what it's dealing with. It just seems like trouble (aka. security risk) waiting to happen.
