On 1/5/21 5:55 PM, Kai Huang wrote: > Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT for use by SGX virtualization to assert EREMOVE > failures are expected, but only due to SGX_CHILD_PRESENT. This dances around the fact that this is an architectural error-code. Could that be explicit? Maybe the subject should be: Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT hardware error code
