On 10/19/20 1:45 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 07:50:43AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> +config INTEL_SGX > Since the directory for this was renamed some iterations ago from > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx to intel_sgx given the feedback from Boris, > I'm wondering should this also be renamed as X86_SGX? I say yes for two reasons: We're recently adding a prohibition against vendors adding VENDOR_FEATURE, preferring "FEATURE" instead. But, I seriously doubt anyone else is going to to to the effort that Intel did here. Also "SGX" is short enough that I can imagine someone else plausibly wanting to do CONFIG_SGX for something else. So, I'm OK with keeping "INTEL_SGX", but I'd also be fine with "X86_SGX".
