On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:10:45AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..f54da5f19c2b > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) > > > > You use gpl-only header files in this file, so how in the world can it > > be bsd-3 licensed? > > > > Please get your legal department to agree with this, after you explain > > to them how you are mixing gpl2-only code in with this file. > > This specifies license of driver.c, not of the headers included. Are > you saying that it is impossible to have a kernel driver with anything > else than GPL-2? That would be news to many, and that's not what > current consensus is. If you want to write any non-GPL-2-only kernel code, you had better be consulting your lawyers and get very explicit instructions on how to do this in a way that does not violate any licenses. I am not a lawyer, and will not be giving you any such advice, as I think it's not something that people should be doing. greg k-h
