On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > I might be late to the game, but why are you trying to dual-license the > new files you are adding in this patch? How will that help anyone? > > I have had many talks with Intel about this in the past, and last I > heard was that when dual-licensing made sense, they would be explicit as > to why it was happening. Or is my memory failing me? My true and honest answer is that I cannot recall. Not sure even if it was like when the driver was still out-of-tree implementation. This would back to 2016 :-) But we don't need to dig the exact answr because ➜ linux-tpmdd (next) ✔ git --no-pager grep -e BSD --and \( -e SPDX \) -- "arch/*.[Sc]" arch/arm64/lib/tishift.S:/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) Oh darn, I guess this implies that my hands are tied :-) I'll gladly implement the change. > thanks, > > greg k-h Thank you. /Jarkko
