On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:45:27PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 9/28/20 12:32 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > My problem is that I fully agree what you say in your description but > > disagree on that EMODPE should not be mentioned. > > I'll just be very clear: I'm not willing to ack any patch with a > changelog that has more than a passing mention of EMODPE. > > Do what you think is best, but if sticking to your guns may deplete the > pool of folks willing to ack your patch. I do see it mentioned in other responses too in this thread, and not just mine. And here is even a request to get it to the changelog: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/1B23E216-0229-4BDD-8B09-807256A54AF5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I'm absolutely fine not to mention EMODPE but after re-reading the thread, it is not like there is one voice on it. I don't really care all that much whether it is mentioned or not but there should be some reasonable logic behind the decision. PS. I just noticed that my previous response did not reach lore so I bounced it again. /Jarkko
