Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/vdso: x86/sgx: Rework __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Aug 26, 2020, at 1:20 PM, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Andy,
> 
> Any thoughts on using a struct versus a plethora of params?  If you don't
> have a strong opinion, I'd like to push for the struct option as it fixes
> the -EFAULT weirdness, satisfies Nathaniel's request, and gives some
> flexibility for the future.  The code impact, both to the vDSO and to the
> caller, is largely a lateral move, i.e. it's different but in the end
> doesn't require any more or less work.

I have no preference.





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux