Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/vdso: x86/sgx: Rework __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-08-18 06:24, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>  /**
>   * __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() - Enter an SGX enclave
> @@ -119,16 +153,14 @@ typedef int (*sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t)(long rdi, long rsi, long rdx,
>   * @leaf:	ENCLU leaf, must be EENTER or ERESUME
>   * @r8:		Pass-through value for R8
>   * @r9:		Pass-through value for R9
> - * @tcs:	TCS, must be non-NULL
> - * @e:		Optional struct sgx_enclave_exception instance
> - * @handler:	Optional enclave exit handler
> + * @r:		struct sgx_enclave_run, must be non-NULL
>   *
>   * NOTE: __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() does not ensure full compliance with the
> - * x86-64 ABI, e.g. doesn't explicitly clear EFLAGS.DF after EEXIT.  Except for
> - * non-volatile general purpose registers, preserving/setting state in
> - * accordance with the x86-64 ABI is the responsibility of the enclave and its
> - * runtime, i.e. __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() cannot be called from C code
> - * without careful consideration by both the enclave and its runtime.
> + * x86-64 ABI, e.g. doesn't handle XSAVE state.  Except for non-volatile
> + * general purpose registers, EFLAGS.DF, and RSP alignment, preserving/setting
> + * state in accordance with the x86-64 ABI is the responsibility of the enclave
> + * and its runtime, i.e. __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() cannot be called from C
> + * code without careful consideration by both the enclave and its runtime.
>   *
>   * All general purpose registers except RAX, RBX and RCX are passed as-is to
>   * the enclave.  RAX, RBX and RCX are consumed by EENTER and ERESUME and are
> @@ -160,16 +192,12 @@ typedef int (*sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t)(long rdi, long rsi, long rdx,
>   * without returning to __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave().
>   *
>   * Return:
> - *  0 on success,
> + *  0 on success (ENCLU reached),
>   *  -EINVAL if ENCLU leaf is not allowed,
> - *  -EFAULT if an exception occurs on ENCLU or within the enclave
> - *  -errno for all other negative values returned by the userspace exit handler
>   */
>  typedef int (*vdso_sgx_enter_enclave_t)(unsigned long rdi, unsigned long rsi,
>  					unsigned long rdx, unsigned int leaf,
>  					unsigned long r8,  unsigned long r9,
> -					void *tcs,
> -					struct sgx_enclave_exception *e,
> -					sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t handler);
> +					struct sgx_enclave_run *r);
>  
>  #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_SGX_H */
> 

I think this should return void now, not int? Then, the “return” section of the documentation is also no longer correct.

--
Jethro Beekman | Fortanix


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux