On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 01:08:33AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +static int sgx_validate_secs(const struct sgx_secs *secs,
> + unsigned long ssaframesize)
> +{
> + if (secs->size < (2 * PAGE_SIZE) || !is_power_of_2(secs->size))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (secs->base & (secs->size - 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (secs->miscselect & sgx_misc_reserved_mask ||
> + secs->attributes & sgx_attributes_reserved_mask ||
> + secs->xfrm & sgx_xfrm_reserved_mask)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (secs->attributes & SGX_ATTR_MODE64BIT) {
> + if (secs->size > sgx_encl_size_max_64)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (secs->size > sgx_encl_size_max_32)
> + return -EINVAL;
These should be >=, not >, the SDM uses one of those fancy ≥ ligatures.
Internal versions use more obvious pseudocode, e.g.:
if ((DS:TMP_SECS.ATTRIBUTES.MODE64BIT = 1) AND
(DS:TMP_SECS.SIZE AND (~((1 << CPUID.18.0:EDX[15:8]) – 1)))
{
#GP(0);
}
> +
> + if (!(secs->xfrm & XFEATURE_MASK_FP) ||
> + !(secs->xfrm & XFEATURE_MASK_SSE) ||
> + (((secs->xfrm >> XFEATURE_BNDREGS) & 1) !=
> + ((secs->xfrm >> XFEATURE_BNDCSR) & 1)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!secs->ssa_frame_size || ssaframesize > secs->ssa_frame_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (memchr_inv(secs->reserved1, 0, sizeof(secs->reserved1)) ||
> + memchr_inv(secs->reserved2, 0, sizeof(secs->reserved2)) ||
> + memchr_inv(secs->reserved3, 0, sizeof(secs->reserved3)) ||
> + memchr_inv(secs->reserved4, 0, sizeof(secs->reserved4)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
