Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/sgx: Put enclaves into anonymous files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:01:38PM +0300, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> On 6.4.2020 9.42, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> > On 2020-04-04 09:27, Topi Miettinen wrote> Then initramfs should make a similar exception as with v86d and grant exec to /dev.
> > 
> > I'm not sure this is a reasonable approach. Expect most devices with an Intel processor will have the SGX device going forward. Then, no one is using noexec, so why have this logic at all?
> 
> Intel does not control the whole market yet, does AMD also offer SGX or
> similar? Will SGX be also available for consumer devices? Are distros going
> to enable SGX, will it benefit their users somehow?

It has a strong user base, yes. That's the whole reason for upstreaming it
(like always). It has been available on all CPUs since Skylake.

/Jarkko



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux