On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 23:27 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 09:57 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > For the vDSO, only marginally. I'm counting +4,-2 instructions in my
> > suggestions. For the wrapper, things become significantly simpler.
>
> Simpler is not a quality that has very high importance here except
> when it comes to vDSO.
>
> At least it is not enough to change to vDSO. What else?
~~
the
In any case, where I stand is that the vDSO implementation itself is
exactly how it should be. The process to get it to this form was
tedious. Now we have a form that the known userbase can live with.
The documentation sucks, agreed. I think by fixing that this would
be a wholelot better.
/Jarkko
