On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 02:30:45AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Why? The number of pages processed is effectively returned via the params > on any error, e.g. wouldn't it be more appropriate to return -ERESTARTSYS? > And I don't see any reason to add an arbitrary cap on the number of pages, > e.g. SGX plays nice with the scheduler and signals, and restricting the > number of EPC pages available to a process via cgroups (returning -ENOMEM) > is a better solution for managing EPC. Returning -ENOMEM does not tell you from which page to retry. /Jarkko
