On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:49:20PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Use atomic_add() instead of running atomic_inc() in a loop to manually > do the equivalent addition. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > index 499a9b0740c8..d45bf6fca0c8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > @@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ static bool __init sgx_alloc_epc_section(u64 addr, u64 size, > list_add_tail(&page->list, §ion->unsanitized_page_list); > } > > - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) > - atomic_inc(&sgx_nr_free_pages); > + atomic_add(nr_pages, &sgx_nr_free_pages); > > return true; > > -- > 2.22.0 > There reason I used atomic_inc() was that atomic_add() takes int that could potentially overflow. I'll ignore this as I'll do the revert that I promised to do. /Jarkko