On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:10:24AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Actually, maybe like this: > > > > struct sgx_enclave_add_page_desc { > > __u64 addr; > > __u64 offset; > > __u64 secinfo; > > __u16 mrmask; > > __u8 reserved[6]; > > }; > > > > struct sgx_enclave_add_page { > > __u64 src; > > __u64 nr_pages; > > __u64 pages; > > }; > > Of course we should remove @addr: > > struct sgx_enclave_add_page_desc { > __u64 offset; > __u16 mrmask; > __u8 reserved[6]; > }; > > struct sgx_enclave_add_page { > __u64 src; > __u64 secinfo; > __u64 nr_pages; > __u64 pages; > }; > > That is something we have forgot to do. We should have started to use > offset instead of address when we moved to fd based API. Anyway I think > this kind of API where you give array of descriptors from one source > would be optimal. > > Also, @secinfo is better to be out of the descriptor so that let say > LSM checks could be done with a single callback. Famous last words, but hopefully I can get this to you tomorrow, as well as the vDSO changelog rewrite.