Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] x86/sgx: Move SGX_ENCL_DEAD check to sgx_reclaimer_write()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 01:17:55PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Do enclave state checks only in sgx_reclaimer_write(). Checking the
> enclave state is not part of the sgx_encl_ewb() flow. The check is done
> differently for SECS and for addressable pages.
> 
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shay Katz-zamir <shay.katz-zamir@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Serge Ayoun <serge.ayoun@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c | 69 +++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
> index e758a06919e4..a3e36f959c74 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/reclaim.c
> @@ -308,47 +308,45 @@ static void sgx_encl_ewb(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
>  
>  	encl_page->desc &= ~SGX_ENCL_PAGE_RECLAIMED;
>  
> -	if (!(atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_DEAD)) {
> -		va_page = list_first_entry(&encl->va_pages, struct sgx_va_page,
> -					   list);
> -		va_offset = sgx_alloc_va_slot(va_page);
> -		if (sgx_va_page_full(va_page))
> -			list_move_tail(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);
> +	va_page = list_first_entry(&encl->va_pages, struct sgx_va_page,
> +				   list);
> +	va_offset = sgx_alloc_va_slot(va_page);
> +	if (sgx_va_page_full(va_page))
> +		list_move_tail(&va_page->list, &encl->va_pages);
> +
> +	ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(encl, epc_page, va_page, va_offset,
> +			     page_index);
> +	if (ret == SGX_NOT_TRACKED) {
> +		ret = __etrack(sgx_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page));
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (encls_failed(ret) ||
> +			    encls_returned_code(ret))
> +				ENCLS_WARN(ret, "ETRACK");
> +		}
>  
>  		ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(encl, epc_page, va_page, va_offset,
>  				     page_index);
>  		if (ret == SGX_NOT_TRACKED) {
> -			ret = __etrack(sgx_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page));
> -			if (ret) {
> -				if (encls_failed(ret) ||
> -				    encls_returned_code(ret))
> -					ENCLS_WARN(ret, "ETRACK");
> -			}
> -
> -			ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(encl, epc_page, va_page, va_offset,
> -					     page_index);
> -			if (ret == SGX_NOT_TRACKED) {
> -				/*
> -				 * Slow path, send IPIs to kick cpus out of the
> -				 * enclave.  Note, it's imperative that the cpu
> -				 * mask is generated *after* ETRACK, else we'll
> -				 * miss cpus that entered the enclave between
> -				 * generating the mask and incrementing epoch.
> -				 */
> -				on_each_cpu_mask(sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask(encl),
> -						 sgx_ipi_cb, NULL, 1);
> -				ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(encl, epc_page, va_page,
> -						     va_offset, page_index);
> -			}
> +			/*
> +			 * Slow path, send IPIs to kick cpus out of the
> +			 * enclave.  Note, it's imperative that the cpu
> +			 * mask is generated *after* ETRACK, else we'll
> +			 * miss cpus that entered the enclave between
> +			 * generating the mask and incrementing epoch.
> +			 */
> +			on_each_cpu_mask(sgx_encl_ewb_cpumask(encl),
> +					 sgx_ipi_cb, NULL, 1);
> +			ret = __sgx_encl_ewb(encl, epc_page, va_page,
> +					     va_offset, page_index);
>  		}
> +	}
>  
> -		if (ret)
> -			if (encls_failed(ret) || encls_returned_code(ret))
> -				ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EWB");
> +	if (ret)
> +		if (encls_failed(ret) || encls_returned_code(ret))
> +			ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EWB");
>  
> -		encl_page->desc |= va_offset;
> -		encl_page->va_page = va_page;
> -	}
> +	encl_page->desc |= va_offset;
> +	encl_page->va_page = va_page;
>  }
>  
>  static void sgx_reclaimer_write(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
> @@ -359,10 +357,11 @@ static void sgx_reclaimer_write(struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
>  
> -	sgx_encl_ewb(epc_page, SGX_ENCL_PAGE_INDEX(encl_page));
>  	if (atomic_read(&encl->flags) & SGX_ENCL_DEAD) {
>  		ret = __eremove(sgx_epc_addr(epc_page));
>  		WARN(ret, "EREMOVE returned %d\n", ret);

SGX_ENCL_PAGE_RECLAIMED is left dangling on encl_page in the SGX_ENCL_DEAD
case.  It doesn't affect functionality, but it could complicate debug if
anything goes awry.

> +	} else {
> +		sgx_encl_ewb(epc_page, SGX_ENCL_PAGE_INDEX(encl_page));
>  	}
>  
>  	encl_page->epc_page = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux