On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:17:53PM -0700, Xing, Cedric wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:57:52PM -0700, Xing, Cedric wrote: > > > > Using the untrusted stack as a way to exchange data is very > > > > convenient, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea. Here are some > > > > problems it > > > > causes: > > > > > > > > - It prevents using a normal function to wrap enclave entry (as > > > > we're seeing with this patch set). > > > > > > It doesn't prevent. > > > > Yes it does, keyword being "normal". Though I guess we could do a bit > > of bikeshedding on the definition of normal... > > I don't understand what you mean by "normal". My apologies, I missed the code snippet in your original code, I was thinking of a previous idea involving a JMP %rbp. Please ignore this bit of discussion.
