On 12/7/18 10:15 AM, Jethro Beekman wrote: > This is not sufficient to support the Fortanix SGX ABI calling > convention, which was designed to be mostly compatible with the SysV > 64-bit calling convention. The following registers need to be passed in > to an enclave from userspace: RDI, RSI, RDX, R8, R9, R10. The following > registers need to be passed out from an enclave to userspace: RDI, RSI, > RDX, R8, R9. Are you asking nicely to change the new Linux ABI to be consistent with your existing ABI? Or, are you saying that the new ABI *must* be compatible with this previous out-of-tree implementation?
