Re: [PATCH v2 10/35] nds32: Atomic operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:27:57PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
> +static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t * lock)
> +{
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"xor	$r15,  $r15, $r15\n"
> +		"swi	$r15, [%0]\n"
> +		:
> +		:"r"(&lock->lock)
> +		:"memory");
> +}

This looks suspicious. There's no clobber for $r15, so isn't this
corrupting a GPR behind the back of the compiler?

Shouldn't there be a tmp variable for the register allocation rather
than hard-coding $r15?

> +static inline void arch_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t * rw)
> +{
> +	asm volatile(
> +		"xor	$r15, $r15, $r15\n"
> +		"swi	$r15, [%0]\n"
> +		:
> +		:"r"(&rw->lock)
> +		:"memory","$r15");
> +}

This time you have a clobber, but it's still not clear to me why you
don't use a tmp variable and leave the register allocation to the
compiler.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux