Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ACPI serdev support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hans,

>>>>>>>> Add ACPI support for serial attached devices.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Currently, serial devices are not set as enumerated during
>>>>>>>> ACPI scan for SPI or i2c buses (but not for UART). This
>>>>>>>> should also be done for UART serial devices.  I renamed
>>>>>>>> *spi_i2c_slave* to *serial_bus_slave* to reflect this.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This needs Johan Hovold's "serdev: fix registration of
>>>>>>>> second slave" patch.
>>>>>>> In theory this series could go in through the acpi-tree
>>>>>>> without my fix. It would only affect an error case where an
>>>>>>> unlikely failure to register an ACPI serdev device, would
>>>>>>> prevent the tty-class device from being registered instead of
>>>>>>> the controller. That is, something we can live with until this
>>>>>>> all converges in 4.15-rc1 if needed.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That said, I think we should consider taking all serdev
>>>>>>> changes, and therefore also the ACPI patch, through the tty
>>>>>>> tree instead in order to avoid merge conflicts. Rafael?
>>>>>> OK
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please feel free to add
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> to the ACPI core change.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And I will assume that this series will go in via the tty tree.
>>>>> you have to take these two patches now via the TTY tree now. In
>>>>> case you already marked them as someone else problem ;)
>>>> Is there any problem I missed with those patches?
>>>> Do I have to re-send them?
>>> 
>>> No, they are in my queue, still catching up...
>> I just realised that we cannot merge this series (the second acpi patch)
>> until the hci_intel driver gains serdev support or otherwise PM will
>> break for those devices.
>> Specifically, the hci_intel driver uses similar hacks as the hci_bcm
>> driver does for PM, so we need something like Hans's hci_bcm series also
>> for hci_intel before we can do the switch.
> 
> Hmm, I've never actually seen any hardware use an intel BT HCI connected
> to a serdev, but I guess people did not write that code for fun, so those
> do exist ?

they are all ACPI based and could now start using serdev. Previously they were all driven by btattach.

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux